Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Apakah PKS Menyetujui Hukum Lempar Batu Sampai Mati di Aceh?(Qanun Jinayah )

Assalamu'alaikum wrwb

Sesungguhnya tidak ada dalam Al Quran hukum Mati dengan lempar Batu kepada Perzina2 (Qanun Jinayah ).

Ulama2 Fundamentalis Aceh mengikuti budaya2 Arab yang kejam dan Bengis....Nauzubilah.

Islam bukanlah Arab-----dan Arab bukanlah Islam----ini harus di perhatikan sekali----kalau tidak umat Islam Indonesia akan menjadi Arab.

Hadits2 budaya Arab itu untuk orang2 Arab saja; Hadist2 itu bukan Syariat Islam.

Apakah pembaca budiman(PKS) menyetujui hukum lempar batu untuk wanita2 zina?
Apakah KPS mengikutipemhaman Islam Salafy-wahabi Saudi Arabia?

Bagaimana pendapat anda?

Semoga ALLAH memberikan hidayah kepada pemimpin2 Aceh agar kuat mecegah hukum2 yang bukan berdasarkan kepada AL Quran.

Wassalam
===============================================================

Indonesia: New law in Aceh makes adultery punishable by stoning
The Women Living Under Muslim Laws (WLUML) international solidarity network and the Global Campaign to Stop Killing and Stoning Women (SKSW Campaign) are gravely concerned to learn of a set of regressive new laws introduced in Aceh, Indonesia on 14 September 2009.

Indonesia's province of Aceh has passed a new law that imposes severe sentences for consensual extra-marital sexual relations, rape, homosexuality, alcohol consumption and gambling. Previously, Aceh's partially-adopted Sharia law enforced dress codes and mandatory prayers. <font color="red">"This law is a preventive measure for Acehnese people so that they will avoid moral degradation," said Moharriyadia, a spokesman for the Prosperous Justice Party.</font>
 
The legislation was passed unanimously by Aceh's regional legislature. "This law will be effective in 30 days with or without the approval of Aceh's governor," said assembly member Bahrom Rasjidhe. The governor of Aceh, a former rebel with the Free Aceh Movement, is opposed to strict Sharia law. He had urged more debate over the bill. A new parliament will be sworn in next month, after local polls saw the moderate Aceh Party win the most seats in the provincial assembly. The Aceh Party has said it will review the law once the new parliament is sitting. "It needs more public consultation. We need to involve the ulemas - the Islamic clerics - in drafting the law," said Adnan Beuransah, a spokesperson for the Aceh Party. About 90% of Indonesia's 235 million people are Muslim, practicing a moderate form of the religion.

<!-- introbreak -->
Sharia law in Aceh

The sharia law has been steadily expanding in Aceh over the last eight years. The Sharia Court (Mahkamah Syar’iyyah) was established in 2001 as part of the special autonomy granted the province. In 2002, the Aceh Legislative Council enacted the qanun (legal code) of the Sharia Court. The Sharia Court was formally inaugurated by Presidential decree in 2003. In 2004, there was a formal transfer of some criminal jurisdiction (jinayat) from the General Court to the Sharia Court by the decree of the Supreme Court. In 2005, the Sharia Court was in full operation and executing its verdicts. Among the laws that has been passed are mandatory headscarves for women, prohibition on alcohol, morality policing, compulsory prayers, and caning sentences meted out for gambling.

On Monday 14 September 2009, the expansion of sharia law took a quantum leap with the legislation of new punishments that are cruel, inhuman and degrading:

• Adultery: 100 cane lashes for the unmarried and stoning to death for those who are married • Homosexuality: 100 cane lashes and a maximum fine of 1,000 grams of fine gold, or imprisonment of up to 100 months • Pedophilia: Up to 200 cane lashes and a fine of up to 2,000 grams of fine gold, or maximum imprisonment of 200 months • Rape: At least 100 cane lashes and maximum 300 cane lashes or imprisonment of at least 100 months and a maximum of 200 months

Both opponents and supporters of the new law demonstrated outside parliament. According to news reports, all members of the 69-seat house voted for the bill, although some parliamentarians had previously voiced their opposition. Assembly member and supporter of the bill, Bahrom Rasjid, stated “This law will be effective in 30 days with or without the approval of Aceh’s governor”. It has been reported that the Governor of Aceh, a former rebel with the Free Aceh Movement, is opposed to the imposition of strict Muslim laws. Moderates are urging more debate over this bill, involving religious leaders and the opinions of civil society.

These new laws affect not only women, but in practice, women are far more likely to become victims of stoning. Even though there is no article in law that mandates punishment by stoning exclusively for women, patriarchal and discriminatory practices, interpretations and policies, as well as biological differences such as pregnancy, make women far more likely than men to be found guilty of so-called “adultery”.

Other than the sentence of stoning to death, the new Qanun Jinayah (Islamic Criminal Legal Code) will bring about the following problems:

• Simplification of the problems of rape (the threat of the law lumping together rape cases with cases of consensual sex outside marriage, i.e. zina) • Legalisation of rape in the household • Making the victim of rape the guilty party (which should actually be the rapist) if the victim were to report that she had been raped but is unable to provide four male witnesses who saw her being raped • Impunity given to rapists who rape at the command of superiors with authority – a frightening prospect if Aceh were to be again a site of military operations, as the rapists would be able to rape freely with this law • Harsh criminalization of alleged “homosexual behaviour” based on dressing and mannerisms

The potential for conflict between communities is already beginning to be visible. Fokus (a pseudonym used by a KAMMI activist) has communicated to the media that they are going to chase out of Aceh those who ask for the Qanun to be rejected.

Partai Keadilan Sejahtera (PKS), the fundamentalist Justice and Prosperity Party, said in a press conference in Aceh (17 September 2009) that all those who oppose the Qanun Jinayat are the stooges of “foreigners.

In Lhokseumawe, “religious people” who are arrested for assaulting others are asking for their cases to be moved from the General Court to the Sharia Court. They feel that the Sharia Court will judge them favourably because what they have done is to implement the Islamic sharia, according to how the Qanun is supposed to have regulated the duties of society.
Action needed:
The latest news (17 September 2009) is that the national government of Indonesia may review this new law in Aceh. The immediate priority is to ensure that this review is undertaken. International support calling for this is very much needed. Please support this call by writing a letter to the President of Indonesia to call on him to stand firm on his commitment to women's rights and human rights. Please also send letters to other Indonesian authorities.

Below is a sample letter setting out the demands of women's rights and civil society groups in Indonesia:

Subject: URGENT review of new Qanun Jinayah (Islamic Criminal Legal Code) in Aceh

[Dear Sir/Madam/Your Excellency],

I am gravely concerned to learn that on Monday 14 September 2009, in the Indonesian province of Aceh, the Aceh Legislative Council (DPRD) passed a law that expands the range of violent punishments for alleged moral and sexual transgressions, including stoning to death for “adultery” and 100 lashes for homosexuality.

This legislation has been passed despite protests from the Governor of Aceh and civil society. There are thirty days from 14 September until this law comes into effect.

I believe that these new laws are in violation of several Articles of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, particularly:

• Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
• Article 5: No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
• Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

These Articles were elaborated in major international human rights conventions – specifically, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, both of which Indonesia has signed and ratified and is therefore obligated to respect, protect and fulfil in its domestic laws and in practice.

No ‘religion’, ‘culture’ or ‘tradition’ should be used to excuse killing and maiming for alleged moral transgressions. We maintain that stoning to death is a grave and serious violation of international human rights law, and one that should not be overlooked by the international community.

Stoning is not prescribed in the Quran, and some Muslim-majority nations such as Malaysia, Tunisia and Algeria have banned death by stoning. Even in Indonesia, where over 90% of the population is considered to be from Muslim communities, stoning is prohibited as a form of torture by the national Constitution.

According to Komnas Perempuan (the National Commission on Violence Against Women), the most controversial point of the legislation passed by the Aceh Legislative Council is that for the first time stoning to death would be codified in the Indonesian legal system and Islamic jurisdiction would be expanded into criminal law when in fact national law should carry legal authority.

I also wish to point out that apart from the sentence of stoning to death, the new Qanun Jinayah (Islamic Criminal Legal Code) will bring about the following problems:

• Rape cases will be lumped with cases of consensual sex outside marriage, i.e. zina.
• Marital rape will be legalised.
• The victim of rape will be accused of being the guilty party in the case where the victim reports her rape but is unable to provide four male witnesses.
• Impunity will be given to rapists who rape at the command of superiors with authority
• There will be harsh criminalisation of alleged ‘homosexual behaviour’ based on dress and mannerisms

I join Komnas Perempuan and allies in Indonesia in appealing to the following decision-makers:

• We call on the Indonesian Constitutional Court (MK) to undertake a judicial review of Law No. 11/2006 of the Government of Aceh (LOGA) concerning the sources the Aceh Legislative Council has used to pass the law.
• We call on the Governor of Aceh to take serious action to postpone the implementation of this legislation which incorporates certain interpretations of sharia law, and to support an open and comprehensive judicial review.
• We call on the Minister of Domestic Affairs to improve the effectiveness of the Department of Domestic Affairs in preventing the creation of discriminatory local regulations that are against the national Constitution.
• Most important of all, we encourage the President of the Republic of Indonesia to stand firm in his commitment to women’s and human rights, and to take political action by issuing a Presidential Instruction for all government officials in the ministries and local government to conduct a comprehensive review of and repeal discriminatory and unconstitutional regulations, especially the new law in Aceh.

Yours sincerely,

[name/organisation]
Addresses:
• His Excellency The President of the Republic of Indonesia
Dr. H. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono
State Secretariate
Jalan Veteran No. 17-19
Jakarta
Republic of Indonesia
Fax: +62-21-3502285
Ph. +62-21-34830724


• Governor of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam
Jalan Tjut Nyak Arief 219
Banda Aceh
Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam
Fax. +62-651-7553621
Ph. +62-651-7551377
 

16 comments:

  1. "Hadist2 itu bukan Syariat Islam"

    Langsung bisa saya lihat anda ini KAFIR sekafir-kafirnya.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jangan sepotong sepotong mengambil tulisan saya,bisa salah mengerti Bung...

    Hadits2 budaya Arab itu untuk orang2 Arab saja; Hadist2 itu bukan Syariat Islam.

    Yang saya maksud adalah Hadits2 yang bukan menjelaskan wahyu2 ALLAH adalah hadits2 budaya arab.
    Misalnya; berjenggot,--- berjabang,--- mahram,--- wanita2 dilarang menyopir,--- dilarang bersalaman dgn laki2---
    dilarang memaki sendok dan garpu----dillarang---begitu juga rajam.

    Hadits2 saih adalah sangat memegang peranan penting, namun hadits2 budaya Arab adalah terbelakang.
    Siapa yang menuduh saudaranya kafir,dialah yang kafir (hadits Muslim)

    Semoga bermanfaat.

    ReplyDelete
  3. he..he..he..
    logika latif abdul masuk akal juga..

    gue sepekat dengan latif abdul..

    terserah kalau nanti di anggap kafir...

    wong gusdur aja di anggap kafir apalagi gue.. :D

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sebentar, wanita dilarang menyopir itu hadist budaya Arab? Emangnya di jaman Nabi ada menyopir?

    Terserah kalau saya nanti dicap kafir sama Allah karena menganggap kamu Kafir, tapi yang jelas saya sedang membela hadist-hadist Nabi yang shahih dan WAJIB dijadikan landasan berkehidupan para pemeluk Muslim. Kalau memang tidak mengambil hadist, mau ngambil dari mana? Dari Gus Dur yang gak sholat? Dari Ulil yang sholat jumat aja gak mau? DARI MANA, TERANGKAN?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kalau anda ingin tahu definisi hadits lihat disini,terperinci....
    http://latifabdul.multiply.com/journal/item/477

    Sorang Islam sejati itu membawa kedamaian=peace---peace---peace.itulah makna Islam.
    Seorang yang bereshalat yang benar itu,kata kata yg keluar dari mulutnya bersih, tidak kotor dan buruk.
    Itu ciri2nyata seorang Islam yang sejati.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Tapi coba lihat kata-kata kamu sendiri:

    Ulama2 Fundamentalis Aceh mengikuti budaya2 Arab yang kejam dan Bengis....Nauzubilah.

    ini tuduhan kotor dari mana?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Budaya Arab yang kejam dan bengis adalah;

    Seperti memotong tangan dan jari...(primitif)
    Seperti hukum rajam, membunuh wanita dgn melempar batu...( primitif)
    Seperti Taliban dan Al qaida membunuh orang2 Civil...(primitif)
    Seperti 2 juta umat Islam Syiah diperlakukan diskriminasi..(Zolim)

    Terlau banyak...cukup demikian saja..nauzubillah...apakah begitu ajaran Islam yang suci dari Rasulullah saw?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bagaimana bisa memotong tangan dan jari dianggap primitif, padahal itulah hukum yang benar dan bisa membuat jera pelakunya dan membuat orang lain tidak berkeinginan melakukan?

    Quran bilang --- pencuri potonglah kedua tangan mereka [5:38].

    Apakah haji juga primitif karena mengikuti kebiasaan para arab terdahulu?

    pakah orang-orang yang menghina para sahabat boleh kita anggap masih beriman kepada Nabi padahal Nabi sendiri menyanjung-nyanjung para sahabat?

    Masuklah Islam secara penuh dengan mengikuti Uswatun Hasanah yang teladannya diriwayatkan dalam hadist-hadist shahi. Ingat: penuh dan tidak memilah-milah.

    Zaman tidak boleh mendikte Islam. Islam lah yang harus mendikte zaman.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ulama2 Islam Fudamentalis Salafy-wahabi saudi berpendapat bahwa kalau diberikan hukuman potong jari, atau hukuman cambuk akan hilang orang2 pencuri atau berzina....apakah benar itu?
    Sudah ratusan tahun di amalkan hukum2 itu, tohhh masih banyak orang2 berzina dan mencuri...di Arab?

    Baru baru ini TKW indonesia yang di zina oleh laki2 Arab....bukan satu kali ini saja...sudah sering..

    Jadi selagi setan masih ada, perbuatan2 setan itu tidak akan habis2nya...
    Yang paling menyurap untuk membatasi perbuatan2 buruk dan kriminal itu adalah "pendidikan yang benar"
    dan terus menerus. Ini adalahtugas ulama2 dan orang2 tua untuk mendidik anak2nya.

    Hukum potong jari itu boleh diganti dgn hukum kurung dan kemudian dididik dgn baik2...
    Hukum potng jari adalah hukum zaman 1400 tahun lalu ,dimana belum ada fasilitas2 rumah tahanan dan polisi.
    dengan mudah saja menghukum seseorang dgn potong JARI...dan hukum GANTUNG di pohon2 kayu...
    Hukum rimba / hutan atau padang Pasir yang tandus...tidak mempunyai fasiliats2 rumah tahanan dan polisi.
    Agama islam itu harus di reformasi sesuai dengan pradapan manusia dan perkebangan ilmu...
    Kalau tidak mengikiti ilmu2 yang maju...maka umat Islam tetap terbelakang jauh di belakang sekali dari umat2 lain2nya...Benar bukan?

    Wasalam

    ReplyDelete
  10. Salafy yang aka hidup adalah salafy yg berpaham Liberal..
    King Abdullah memberikan kebebasan bagi wanita utk tdk berjilbab
    Salafy Fundamentalis (taliban) yang memaksa akan lenyab dibawa arus kemajuan dan ilmu2

    ReplyDelete
  11. menurut pendapat q yang boh lg hina,
    klw hukum yg terbaik bagi umat islam adl hukum islam.
    klw mencuri harus d potong y d potong klw mmg mnrut hukum islam begitu atw sebalik x.

    dari awl islam sampai akhir islam gk berubah,
    contoh: shalat dari dulu pakai bhs.arab sapai skrg ttp bhs.arab walau org yg shalat gk ngerti bhs.arab,
    jd kita gk ush ngikuti jaman yg banyak perubahan,krn sesungguh xklw kina ngikuti agama kita gk akan pernah ketinggalan.

    dsni aq cmn ikut belajar bukan niat ceramahin,
    krn d ats td aq tulis(aq org bohoh lg hina)

    ReplyDelete
  12. itu td postingan aq kopi dari org yg mau minta pendapat krn ingin dia hikum rajam,krn dia telah tobat.dan pendapat x seperti d atas.

    mdh2an paham

    ReplyDelete
  13. dia pernah buat dosa tp tobat jd minta pendapat apakah harus pergi k arab untuk d hukum rajam(sungguh SUBHANAWLAH ORG INI)

    ReplyDelete

  14. STOP Postingan "Latif Abdul" Disini..!!Setuju BangetTidak SetujuTerserah  By: Penghuni PKSAtau Mari kita sama2 Laporkan Latif Abdul >> DISINI

    ReplyDelete
  15. bagaimana orang yang dihukum di neraka dengan suatu siksaan yang pasti tidak akan mampu di tanggungnya, apakah ini kejam, orang yang pernah menikah lalu berzina, maka ia di rajam, anda tidak setuju, nanti anda bertanya langsung kepada Allah di hari yang di nantikan. memang terlihat kejam, tetapi itu syariat.

    ReplyDelete